Listowners-L Archives

Archiver > Listowners > 1999-05 > 0925961584


From: Den_Mari <>
Subject: Fwd: we blocked some spam from your list.
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 22:33:04 -0500


I apologize in advance for this long copy, but it's essential for referencing.

The "spam" that was blocked, if I understand this all correctly, was actually
received on the list. The two posts, from and
both were on the list, and both are
subscribers to the list.

What is being read as spam? These were legitimate posts....
Mari

>From:
>Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 19:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
>Subject: we blocked some spam from your list.
>To:
>X-Spam-Type: IP-address-in-email
>
>Hi --
>
>This is an automated notice from the RootsWeb list server.
>Someone recently sent this message to your list. It looks
>suspiciously like spam, so it was NOT distributed to your list.
>
>However, we're sending you a copy just in case the spam detector
>made a mistake. If this was actually a legitimate message that
>shouldn't have been blocked, please forward this message to
> and tell us, so we can try to make the Spam
>Detective a little smarter.
>
>Thanks --
>The RootsWeb Spam Detective
>
>[rejected spam included below]
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>>From MAILER-DAEMON Wed May 5 19:16:22 1999
>Received: from bl-3.rootsweb.com (bl-3.rootsweb.com [204.212.38.19])
>by bl-14.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA28966
>for <>; Wed, 5 May 1999 19:16:22 -0700
>(PDT)
>Received: from c-5.rootsweb.com (c-5.rootsweb.com [209.164.27.5])
>by bl-3.rootsweb.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA23659
>for <>; Wed, 5 May 1999 19:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from 209.90.142.144 ([209.90.142.144])
>by c-5.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA21906
>for <>; Wed, 5 May 1999 19:15:20 -0700
>Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 21:39:48 EDT
>Message-Id: <>
>From: "Postmaster" <>
>Sender: <>
>To: <>
>Subject: Undeliverable Mail
>
>
>Delivery failed 20 attempts:
>
>
>Original message follows.
>
>Received: from SMTP32-FWD by bosspc.com
> (SMTP32) id A00000053; Wed, 5 May 99 11:17:11 EDT
>Received: from bl-14.rootsweb.com [204.212.38.30] by 209.90.142.144 with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-5.01) id A0F6600BE; Wed, 05 May 1999 11:17:10 EDT
>Received: (from )
>by bl-14.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA22285;
>Wed, 5 May 1999 07:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
>Resent-Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 07:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
>Message-ID: <017701be9706$43106b20$>
>From: "Roland Elliott" <>
>Old-To: <>
>References: <>
><011701be9700$2cb1da40$>
><009601be9703$f57c1b40$>
>Subject: Re: [CHAPMAN-L] Re: Chapmans
>Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 07:47:54 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Resent-Message-ID: <>
>To:
>Resent-From:
>Reply-To:
>X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/3022
>X-Loop:
>Precedence: list
>Resent-Sender:
>
>I have no Idea,I told you what I have been told.I know my grandfather Perc
>James Chapman was born to James William Chapman and Emma Varley in
>Becker,Sherburne co MN and James married Emma there and that is it.R
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Derrick Chapman <>
>To: <>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 7 31
>Subject: Re: [CHAPMAN-L] Re: Chapmans
>
>
>> So is there an all-knowing Yoda of the Chapman tribe in the US? Someone
>who
>> has attempted the impossible task of identifying the progenitor
>immigrants?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Roland Elliott <>
>> To: <>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 10:04 AM
>> Subject: Re: [CHAPMAN-L] Re: Chapmans
>
>[message truncated]

This thread: