Listowners-L Archives

From: <>
Subject: Re: New Surname Resources -Confused!
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:52:29 EDT

In a message dated 5/25/99 1:31:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
writes:

> Also I never thought, or new, according to Rootsweb,
> one list is more important or popular than the
> next.

Hi Patricia- not more "important" -- just more prevalent. It does not mean
any surnames that have sponsor will lose their lists/boards no matter how
uncommon they are.

Joan

This thread:

• New Surname Resources - missing MAGGARD by <>
  • Re: New Surname Resources - missing MAGGARD by <>
  • Re: New Surname Resources - missing MAGGARD by "Andrew Billinghurst" <>
  • New Surname Resources -Confused! by Patricia Manson <>

  • Re: New Surname Resources -Confused! by <>

  • Re: New Surname Resources -Confused! by Lesley Shockey <>
  • Re: New Surname Resources -Confused! by Nora Hiatt <>
  • Re: New Surname Resources -Confused! by <>
  • NEW SURNAME RESOURCES by <>
  • Re: NEW SURNAME RESOURCES by Carol C-H <>
  • Re: NEW SURNAME RESOURCES by Clare <>
  • Re: New Surname Resources -Confused! by Lesley Shockey <>
  • Re: New Surname Resources -Confused! by Diana Gale Matthiesen <>