Listowners-L Archives

Archiver > Listowners > 2000-04 > 0955867068


From: "George W. Durman" <>
Subject: RE: list owner vs list administrator
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 02:37:48 -0400
References: <4.3.2.20000415225358.00b4de60@pop3.concentric.net>
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLHDEKBHMEMBMOLMDEECECOAA.suni@qni.com>


At 12:07 AM 04/16/2000, suni wrote:
*************START OF ORIGINAL MESSAGE TEXT*************
Oh George! I love your posts, but I must differ with you on this one - and I
even think you'd agree with me. Being "Mom" doesn't mean "push-over". If you
have kids, you know you have to get tough with them sometimes. The "Mom"
thing (or whatever other casual term) just means, to me, that we're all in
this thing together. I'll be the Mommy, but I'm there to help the members
and hopefully the lists themselves. If you think I would have ever been a
subservient kind of Mom, you are very wrong. I think that's one of the
biggest problems in our society today!

Kay
(snip)
**************END OF ORIGINAL MESSAGE TEXT**************

Hey, Kay, I have absolutely no problem with "ListMom"! Everyone is free to
call himself/herself whatever he/she desires. My problem is with those who
would criticize those of us who LIKE the term "Listowner". And, "ListMom" is a
wonderful description, really. People get too hung up over terms. Those who
don't like the "owner" part of "Listowner" have a real problem with reality,
IMHO.

SgtGeorge

This thread: