Listowners-L Archives

Archiver > Listowners > 2002-03 > 1015092731


From: "Kinfolk" <>
Subject: Re: [LO] When is the AUP not really the AUP?
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 07:12:11 +1300
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020302100725.00a43790@pop3.norton.antivirus> <5.1.0.14.0.20020302072223.009ffd70@pop.sprynet.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020302110549.01e625a0@pop3.norton.antivirus>


Good Point
> "Commercial activities require permission"
* and this is the main one here.
* And IMHO I can't see Ancestry/MyFamily not approving their own
TagLines. Their rights which we can't touch
* And to get the same rights would cost us in the ballpark of
US$3,000,000 or so
Chris
Turangi NZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Asher" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 5:10 AM
Subject: Re: [LO] When is the AUP not really the AUP?


> At 10:54 AM 3/2/2002, Robert W Fay wrote:
>
> When is a scan not a copy? (private joke, folks :)
>
> >The analog of the line of argumentation you are pursuing is if a rule
says
> >"No soft drinks
> >allowed", you would allow Pepsi as it doesn't specifically state Pepsi is
> >not allowed.
>
> Ah, but the AUP does NOT say "no commercial posts allowed". It says:
>
> "Commercial activities require permission"
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
>
>

This thread: