Listowners-L Archives

Archiver > Listowners > 2002-03 > 1016767638


From: "John B. Lisle" <>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [LO] Reply to whom?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:27:18 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020321200937.056d8008@tqsi.com><3C9A282E.11201.2E69B6@localhost><3C9A76A9.81D0B034@zimres.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020321194649.00a1ee40@mail.earthlink.net>


Debbie,

True, but I do not think it adds a reply-to header. At least I have never
seen it. if it were, I think this message would have one.

john.

At 07:50 PM 3/21/2002 -0600, Debbie Schnell Woolard wrote:
>At 08:13 PM 3/21/02 -0500, John B. Lisle wrote:
>>I do not believe this is true. For example, if Eudora has this
>>capability, I have never found it. I think we should be pleased that
>>most programs do not have the capability and/or that most users do not
>>set it up. That way the list manager's setup is respected.
>
>Per the Eudora Help file:
>"Return address—This is the return email address used in outgoing messages
>and recipientsÂ’ replies, if this address is different from your incoming
>mail account. The address you enter here is included in the From field of
>all your outgoing messages from this account, and when a recipient replies
>to a message from this account, the reply is sent to this address. If you
>do not enter an address in this field, Eudora uses your incoming mail
>account as the return address. Incoming mail accounts are usually of the
>form . For example, suppose your incoming mail
>account is but your return address is
> slightly different. You would then enter
> in this field.
>
>If you do enter an address in this field, first test the address to be
>sure that mail sent to it is indeed delivered to you. If you use an
>invalid return address, no one will be able to reply to your mail."
>
>
>
>
>--Debbie Schnell Woolard
>
>http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~dwoolard
>
>
>
>==============================
>To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
>go to:
>http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237


This thread: