Listowners-L Archives

Archiver > Listowners > 2006-05 > 1148028494


From: "Darrell A. Martin" <>
Subject: Re: [LO] Shared Subscription to Ancestry?
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 03:48:14 -0500
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060518210733.01bf9478@sprynet.com><C0929D8F.3AA6C%listpig@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <C0929D8F.3AA6C%listpig@earthlink.net>


At 09:54 PM 5/18/2006, Listpig wrote:
>[in part]
>
>Beyond that, this from the Ancestry terms of service:
>
>"1.4 You are responsible for all usage or activity on Ancestry via your
>password account. Distribution of your password to others for access to
>Ancestry is expressly prohibited and shall constitute a breach of this
>Agreement. Any fraudulent, abusive, or otherwise illegal activity may be
>grounds for termination of your account, at our sole discretion, and you may
>be referred to appropriate law enforcement agencies."
>
>--pig
>
>
>On 5/18/06 21:25, "Darrell A. Martin" <> wrote:
>
>> I would not have any problem with the message unless I had reason to think the
>> claim -- two users allowed per account -- was false.

Hi, piglet:

In my own defense, I did continue to say that I had not read that two users was allowed. I was focused on whether the message on its face was commercial, and obviously did not put enough emphasis on whether the claim itself was legitimate.

That being said, I would have to agree that "expressly prohibited", "breach of this Agreement", and "may be referred to appropriate law enforcement" would certainly qualify as reasons to think the claim was false [wry grin].

Darrell


Darrell A. Martin - RootsWeb list admin
e-Mail:
List rules: http://home.sprynet.com/~darrellm/list_rules.htm

This thread: