Listowners-L Archives

From: Otto Jørgensen <>
Subject: Re: [LO] Sig Line Length
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:03:18 +0200
References: <000b01c77f1c$8516e330$99478241@LIVINGROOM><20070415181859.FRU16517.mta11.adelphia.net@FeliixTC.feliixplace.com><95b5b6b90704151134l9250326n9ced0fc635587f4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <95b5b6b90704151134l9250326n9ced0fc635587f4@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:34:27 -0500, "Kathie Harrison"
<> wrote:

>5 to 10 lines is EXCESSIVE. I have always heard that according to
>NETIQUETTE it should be 4 lines or less.

supported

More than 4 line is noise
--
Otto Jørgensen
http://home.online.no/~otjoerge/bk/
list owner
All email is checked by NIS2006

This thread:

• [LO] Sig Line Length by "Chandra" <>
  • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
    • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "Kathie Harrison" <>

      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>

        • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "David E. Cann" <>
          • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>
          • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Listpig <>
      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "Jewish Admin" <>
        • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "Richard Berkheiser" <>
          • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "George Waller" <>
            • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by bob gillis <>
              • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Listpig <>
            • [LO] Surname lists -- was Re: Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
              • Re: [LO] Surname lists -- was Re: Sig Line Length by Lynne <>
                • Re: [LO] Surname lists -- was Re: Sig Line Length by "Lauren Boyd" <>
        • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "George W. Durman" <>
      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Andy Hatchett <>
  • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by
    • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>
    • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "George W. Durman" <>
      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by "George Waller" <>
      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by singhals <>
  • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by
    • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Pat Asher <>
    • [LO] Rude CC's -- was Re: Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
      • Re: [LO] Rude CC's -- was Re: Sig Line Length by
        • Re: [LO] Rude CC's -- was Re: Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
  • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by
    • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by bob gillis <>
      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>
      • [LO] * not * Sig Line Length, Re: Sig Line Length by manaia alofa <>
      • [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
        • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by bob gillis <>
          • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by PBG-Genealogy <>
            • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by bob gillis <>
              • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>
            • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
              • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by "Kathie Harrison" <>
            • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
            • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>
              • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by David Sylvester <>
                • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by singhals <>
                • Re: [LO] Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>
        • [LO] Fwd: Re: Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by Andy Hatchett <>
          • Re: [LO] Fwd: Re: Carbon Copies -- was Re: Sig Line Length by Otto Jørgensen <>
      • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by Lee Hoffman <>
    • [LO] Copies (was: Re: Sig Line Length) by Pat Asher <>
  • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by
    • Re: [LO] Message Copies was [Sig Line lenght] by bob gillis <>
  • Re: [LO] Sig Line Length by