MAESSEX-L Archives

Archiver > MAESSEX > 2004-06 > 1087401497


From: Mariana <>
Subject: More Early Boston, MA Births
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:58:17 -0400


>Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:48:56 -0600
>X-From_: Tue Jun 15 10:48:56 2004
>Old-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:48:53 -0400
>From: Ray Brown <>
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4)
>Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 (emach0202)
>X-Accept-Language: en-us
>To: , Essex-MA <>,
> Gen Massachusetts <>
>X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
>X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with
>any abuse report
>X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - megs15.100mwh.com
>X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - rootsweb.com
>X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
>X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - rays-place.com
>X-Source:
>X-Source-Args:
>X-Source-Dir:
>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38
>X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
>Subject: {not a subscriber} More Early Boston, MA Births
>X-Envelope-To: MAESSEX-L
>
>I have the marriages for Boston, MA for 1673 to 1677 typed up and in an MS
>Excel file. If someone would be willing to type the surmanes in another
>col. for the Boston GenWeb I would appreciate it. (915 records)
>This should only take about 1/2 to 3/4 Hours to do, a good typest can do
>it faster. Looking at the line for the surname is the longest part. From
>there I can import the file into MS Access where I write a report for the
>web. In Access they can be in any order so I just left them in the order
>that they were in. For an example of the report I have Access set up in
>Access just visit:
>http://bos-gw.rays-place.com/bbt.htm
>
>If your time is short, you can just do a few at a time over a week or so,
>I am in no hurry for them, would rather have it take longer and be
>accurate. Doing it to fast can cause errors like you will see in Admas on
>the test page where I put Adams in place of Armitage on one line (That
>will be fixed before the next run of it).
>
>When some one is willing to do this part it will leave me more time to
>type up more years to go online. If you have been helped with your
>research on the net this is one way of helping other in return.
>
>Someone else is doing the ones for 1678 to 1683 at this time. When we get
>these all together it will make a good report for the Boston GenWeb site.
>
>I know that most on this list do not live near Boston and don't have
>access to these records, so putting them online is one way that I can help
>make what I have avilable to you. If you are in another part of the
>Country you probably have access to things that those of us in New England
>and other parts of the country don't. If you type up what you have and
>have it put online someplace (local GenWeb, your own site, or donate to
>another) it will help others even if not of use to yourseft. By all of us
>doing that it will make finding things online better.
>
>If anyone has any listings of Births in Boston after 1699 and would be
>willing to share them the Boston GenWeb would be willing to post them.
>Also any records for Charlestown.
>
>Cheers
>Ray Brown
>http://www.rays-place.com
>
>.
>

Mariana Bean Ruggles



This thread: