MDSTMARY-L Archives

Archiver > MDSTMARY > 2002-03 > 1016698306


From: "Norma Thompson" <>
Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY-L] Vansweringen, Pierce, Carmicheal
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:17:52 -0800
References: <9c.1ce7b52f.29cadc38@aol.com>


Do you show a Jane Rhodes living after 1764 with a husband John?


----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY-L] Vansweringen, Pierce, Carmicheal


> Norma,
>
> Please excuse me for putting my two cents in on the Rhodes, but I think the
> John who married Jane Pavatt is the son of John Rhodes who died in 1764.
>
> Peg
>
> In a message dated 3/20/02 10:34:49 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> writes:
>
>
> > Subj:Re: [MDSTMARY-L] Vansweringen, Pierce, Carmicheal
> > Date:3/20/02 10:34:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
> > From:<A HREF="mailto:"></A>
> > To:<A HREF="mailto:"></A>
> > Sent from the Internet
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >From what you sent, John RODES had to have had [at least] three
> > marriages.
> > >
> > I think he may have had more wives than that. He had 10 children and only
> > his
> > son John was mentioned as being "without heirs". If Mark was the only one
> > to
> > receive a legacy from the estate of Joseph Van Swearingen, I infer that he
> > was
> > the only child of his mother. Since Jane Pavett didn't marry John Rhodes
> > until
> > 1752 and was probably past child bearing age, he had to have another wife
> > to
> > mother the other children but possibly John.
> >
> > Bye,
> > Norma
> >
> >
> >
>
>


This thread: