MEADOWS-L Archives

Archiver > MEADOWS > 2007-04 > 1177013880


From: Jean Suddarth <>
Subject: Re: [MEADOWS] Will of Thomas 1655
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:18:00 -0400 (EDT)


Janean-
You are quite free to believe whatever you wish. You did, however, ask what people thought and so I responded with some facts. It is totally your choice to either take it into consideration or not. I understood you to say in a previous e-mail that you wanted to discuss
what you had found and more or less talk it through. My idea of discussion and talking it through is take as many things as possible into consideration in order to come up with a logical conclusion. You may be right-you may be wrong; I don't know. I don't think that is the point. I think the point is to come up with some realistic ideas and possibilities.
Jean

-----Original Message-----
>From: Janean <>
>Sent: Apr 19, 2007 4:06 PM
>To:
>Subject: [MEADOWS] Will of Thomas 1655
>
>June 6, 1655 (Court Order 1652-1655, pg 197) Mr. George Bryer appointed to
>Probate the will. The estate to be appraised by Ambrose Meader, Fran Gower,
>Toby Hurst and Thomas Robinson. The estate was appraised at a value of
>17,502 lbs of tobacco (17,502 x .0333 = $528.82)
>
>
>
>
>
>OK here we go.
>
>
>
>The appraiser/s are appointed by the court. They CAN be a relative but they
>may not be a beneficiary to the will/estate.
>
>
>
>So that makes even more sense that Ambrose was his brother. True? Yes he
>could also be his father under those definitions but based on everything
>else.... I believe the brother theory.
>
>
>
>>From http://www.rootdig.com/adn/probateoverview.html
>
>_____________________________
>To contact the list admin send an email to:
>-------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: