MO-STLOUIS-METRO-L Archives

Archiver > MO-STLOUIS-METRO > 2003-01 > 1041871700


From: Craig Kilby <>
Subject: [StL-Metro] Moon Here First?
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 11:48:43 -0600
In-Reply-To: <1711F1517784D24A8F10B158DCD0A31B02688F53@mail1.tmhq.com>


Now this I have trouble believing, that the moon was here first. In whose
orbit was if there was no earth?

on 01/06/03 9:00 AM, McAuliffe, R. Emmett at
wrote:

> Underscore the word *mythology*. I'm confident that the moon was here
> first. Actually, the latest trend in archaeological *evidence* is that
> caucusoids were here first, based on recent finds in Washington state and
> So. America.
>
> .....................................
> R. Emmett McAuliffe
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Craig Kilby [mailto:]
>> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:47 AM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [StL-Metro] Re: Native American Question
>>
>>
>> For what it's worth, these peoples' mythology goes back so
>> far that there
>> wasn't even a moon. If they aren't Native, nobody is. If
>> there is such a
>> thing as an indigenous population on this planet, it would be they.
>>
>>
>> ==== MO-STLOUIS-METRO Mailing List ====
>> Search the Archive of Messages for MO-STLOUIS-METRO Mailing
>> List at
>> http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=MO
> -STLOUIS-METRO
>
>
>
> ==== MO-STLOUIS-METRO Mailing List ====
> Search the Archive of Messages for MO-STLOUIS-METRO Mailing List at
> http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=MO-STLOUIS-METRO
>

This thread: