Melungeon-L Archives

Archiver > Melungeon > 2002-12 > 1040595753


From:
Subject: Re: [Melungeon] Genetic Markers
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 17:22:33 EST


In a message dated 12/22/2002 5:11:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
writes:

> I agree. This is indeed where the family studies can
> tell us so much. The population study is a very good,
> general start, but surname/family studies - if
> conducted in sufficient numbers - will tell us more in
> the long run.
>
Didn't I read on this list that Dr. Jones DNA test proved the Eastern
Tennessee and Virginia families were related? Also that the Siddhi gene was
found in both Hancock County and Wise County? Is this different than the
"population study" -- I am pretty sure this is in the archives--was there a
surname/family study done or not?

Peace
:-)
Joanne Pezzullo
<A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/ourmelungeons/front.html">http://www.geocities.com/ourmelungeons/front.html</A>;


This thread: