Melungeon-L Archives

Archiver > Melungeon > 2002-12 > 1040944995


From: Brent Kennedy <>
Subject: Re: [Melungeon] I think I got it
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:23:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <003701c2ad2c$9c6312a0$b32c1cce@computer>


Hmmm, maybe. But it's very small disagreement <G>.
Brent


--- Penny Ferguson <> wrote:
> If someone was considered Melungeon, then regardless
> of where their children
> moved they would be Melungeon descendants. The
> place where we disagree may
> be the "father" of two men, one son moved and was
> called Melungeon, and the
> other son stayed with papa. Papa nor son were ever
> considered Melungeon.
> Penny
>
> I would still consider the
> childen and relatives of these folks originally
> termed
> Melungeon to be "Melungeon descendants" and
> "Melungeon
> related," regardless of the passage of time or where
> these descendants might have moved. And that's
> really
>
> http://www.geocities.com/ourmelungeons/front.html
>
>
>
>
> ==== Melungeon Mailing List ====
> Research of Interest
> http://www.multiracial.com/readers/nassau.html
> http://www.genealogy.com/genealogy/12_heing.html
> http://www.multiracial.com/readers/hashaw.html
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

This thread: