Melungeon-L Archives
Archiver > Melungeon > 2003-01 > 1041553866
From: "Dennis Maggard" <>
Subject: Re: [Melungeon] Re: Melungeon-D Digest V02 #1034
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:31:06 -0500
References: <002801c2b2b9$83461fa0$c02c1cce@computer>
From: "Penny Ferguson" <>
> Dennis when I hurried and answered your email this morning, you had said
> that your intuition told you that there were more Melungeons that I was
> stating. That is why I asked for some proof, meaning not your intuition.
> cuz Penny
But Penny, that's not what I said. What I said was that the documented in
writing Melungeons that no one disputes were related to other people, and I
thanked you for providing documentary evidence of that fact if it wasn't
intuitively obvious. Whether or not one considers the people they were
related to Melungeons is a matter of definition, not a matter of intuition
and not a matter of proof.
Dennis
This thread:
| Re: [Melungeon] Re: Melungeon-D Digest V02 #1034 by "Dennis Maggard" <> |