Melungeon-L Archives

Archiver > Melungeon > 2011-04 > 1304049245

Subject: Re: [MELUNGEON] Historical Records.
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:54:05 -0400
References: <A2922BD05A4B49D6A0AF4F5D6C9D0710@toshibauser><><66BBD91AD9E64F9594AA1356A82FADBA@toshibauser><><A73C790400124030A42E0BDD42E57EFE@Jack><><81E83F256A5E49CCB78584EEF5AD6C35@Jack><><4B06825352E14F3984C99BCFD16B5632@Jack><><ECBDFE3E8B8B430BB3DF508909E700AE@Jack>
In-Reply-To: <ECBDFE3E8B8B430BB3DF508909E700AE@Jack>

Page 110 of your book reads NOT BEING A FREE WHITE MAN of age 21 --
disqualified by the laws of these state on account of color.. I see
nothing about 'free negro' -- what page would I find that on?

Joanne Pezzullo
Historical Melungeon Indians

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Goins <>
Sent: Thu, Apr 28, 2011 11:41 pm
Subject: Re: [MELUNGEON] Historical Records.

----- Original Message ----- From:
<>>>>>>Apparently the indictment called them
'free person of color' -- > which from everything I have read included,
Indians, mustees and> mulattoes. They could just as likely been tried
for having Indian> blood as having African blood.. we just don't know
for sure, do we?No Joanne the law was directed at the free Negro, they
would have shipped them to Oklahoma if they were Indians. . I have a
copy of Lewis Minor Grand Jury conviction and they all read about the
same.JAN term 1846. Lewis Minor not being a white man and being
disqualified on account of color by the laws of this state from giving
evidence in a court of Justice against a white man. here to wit on the
Seventh day of August in the year of our Lord one thousand eight
Hundred and Fourty Fivedid then and there knowingly and unlawfully vote
in an election held under the constitution and laws of the United
States for Representive to Congress, for Governor of said state and
members of the state Legislature, this goes on and mentions on account
of Color 3 times in this grand Jury indictment. All these men charged
were listed free colored on the 1830 census and 2 of them charged were
E1b1a African. Jack> Historical Melungeon Indians>>>>; -----Original
Message-----> From: Jack Goins <>> To:
> Sent: Thu, Apr 28, 2011 10:15 pm> Subject: Re:
[MELUNGEON] Historical Records.>>> ----- Original Message ----- From:
<>To:> <>Sent: Thursday,
April 28, 2011 9:34 PMSubject:> Re: [MELUNGEON] Historical Records.>>
----------------------------------------> ### No Joaane you are making>
the assumptions. It plainy says in this> indictment the charges were>
for voting in the election held in August> 1845> for Governor and Rep.>
The judges of the election made the decision to> allow> them to vote,>
the person who filed the charges was not named. The> losers are>>
normally the ones who challenge an election, that's not an
assumption.>> The> hearing where this was bound over to the Grand Jury
was most> likely in> 1845> we have not located the hearing. We have the
records> where this was> turned> over to the Grand Jury and their
descision and> the names of the Grand> Jury> who found them guilty, or
you might say> enough evidence to have them> stand> trial.>>>>>>THIS IS
FROM YOUR> ARITCLE JACK>> ''The 1834 revised Constitution of Tennessee>
specifically disfranchised> Indians, mustees, and mulattoes. The>
illegal voting charges and trials> of known Melungeon families in>
Rogersville proves they did not escape> this discrimination. After two>
separate juries ruled Wiatt Collins and> Zachariah Minor not guilty
the> state dropped the charges on Solomon,> Levi, Ezekial, and Andrew>
Collins and later dropped charges on Lewis> Minor. The answer to why>
the charges were dropped is simple, they were> brothers and cousins.>
Why try Lewis Minor after his brother Zachariah> was found not guilty>
by a Jury? Evidence points to a probable pre trial> deal between their>
lawyer and the state prosecutor on who was to be> tried.''>> Is there>
anything in the records you have found so far that identifies> these>
people as 'Indians, mustees or mulattoes? You don't know who> filed
the> charges, you haven't located the hearing -- and do you know> if
they> were charged because they were mulattoes or Indians, because>
the> bottom line is this is what this is about right? Negro or
Indian.## No,> the grand Jury indictment calls them colored and not
allowed to vote or> to testify against a white man in a court of law.
Indians, or mulattoes> are not mentioned in these trials or in the
state legislation meeting> conducted by John McKinney, who were
discussing free Negroes and> McKinney did not mention Melungeons as
reported by Droomgoole.>
Jack~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MELUNGEON Mailing List>
> istorical-melungeons.blogspot.comFor list problems contact>
Administrator Janet Crain at:>
unsubscribe from
the> list, please send an email to with
the> word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body
of> the message>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> MELUNGEON
Mailing List Archives:>>>>; Lost Colony:>>>>; Melungeon Website:>>>>; Melungeon Blogs:>>>>;>>>; For list problems
contact Administrator Janet Crain at: >>
-------------------------------> To unsubscribe from the list, please
send an email to > with the word
'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the
message ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MELUNGEON Mailing List
istorical-melungeons.blogspot.comFor list problems contact
Administrator Janet Crain at:
unsubscribe from the
list, please send an email to with the
word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of
the message

This thread: