NORCALCHAT-L Archives

Archiver > NORCALCHAT > 1999-01 > 0915255083


From: "Roland Elliott" <>
Subject: Re: Fw: The Clinton Scandals
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 21:31:23 -0800


Interesting you would use the 4th amendment ,Willie himself in 74 stated the
same thing about the then president Nixon that he Lied and used his powers
to subverse his office,he went further you can read it,as to the First Lady
servicing anybody ,that may be the problem.Read Paines "Common Sense" and
the Federalist Papers" then we can talk my Friend.R
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel and Lynn GAzis-SAx <>
To: <>
Date: Friday, January 01, 1999 21 14
Subject: Re: Fw: The Clinton Scandals

Americans interested in preserving the Fourth Amendment right to
protection against ~unreasonable search and seizure~ should
stand tall and tell their Republican Senators to take a stand
against fishing expeditions whose sole intention is political
vendetta and revenge for the First Lady's service on the House
Impeachment Committee of 1974.

Anyone who wants this carried out to the bitter end is anti-Bill of
Rights in my book. We've faced impeachment of the president
twice before: like the first case, I have to say, the charges are
unreasonable, trivial, and uncomprosingly political. In 1974, I note,
~both~ Republicans and Democrats recommended the
impeachment of the President. When a vote like this divides on
party lines and it feels that no matter which way we vote we may
well err, we should choose to do so on the side of caution Six
brave Republicans voted against removing Andrew Johnson. Are
there six brave men among the Republican Senators today?
Fortunately it does not matter: Republicans can vote their party
line and still be defeated. A few Democrats can even defect. But it
would ease my mind if a few conservative men of conscience would
not let their party dictate their vote.

Think about the Fourth Amendment -- it applies to all citizens.

Regards,

Joel GAzis-SAx

Date forwarded: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 18:38:29 -0800 (PST)
From:
Date sent: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 21:38:38 EST
Subject: Re: Fw: The Clinton Scandals
To:
Forwarded by:

ROLAND ALREADY......SO HE'S PLAYER.......
WHAT'S NEW????????
In a message dated 1/1/99 17:00:27, wrote:

>Americans disgusted with the crimes of the Clinton
>
>>> administration must not rest on their laurels
>
>>> following the votes in the House of Representatives
>
>>> charging the president with high crimes and
>
>>> misdemeanors, and challenging his authority to
>
>>> remain in office. The two charges against Clinton,
>
>>> while certainly serious enough to warrant his
>
>>> removal from office, will not be enough to persuade
a
>
>>> sufficient number of Democratic senators to convict.
>
>>>
>
>>> Therefore, it is more important than ever that new
>
>>> evidence and new charges be brought to their
>
>>> attention. They are certainly there -- if the system
>
>is
>
>>> forced to work.

Joel GAzis-SAx
http://www.alsirat.com
http://www.notfrisco.com
Politics are usually the executive expression of
human immaturity.
Vera Brittain

This thread: