NORFOLK-L Archives

Archiver > NORFOLK > 2002-01 > 1010244211


From: "Barry Rasberry" <>
Subject: Re: Christmas in Norfolk - RASBERRY, BUNKLE, HOWARD, RASBURY
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 16:23:31 +0100
References: <160.67d0244.2964a5f9@aol.com> <019401c193ec$561eab60$336f87d9@leight> <05d501c19568$dd9e48c0$3f1388d9@barry5ei1ddtca> <3C36AB13.56587DF8@BallFamilyRecords.co.uk> <031101c195e9$2ac29b80$0100007f@dorne>


Dorne,

I also have found a Dec 1854 Freebridge Lynn wedding between a Charles
RASBERRY & Eliza HOWARD. No sign of them on the 1881 census but probably a
bit early to have fathered Charles Henry RASBERRY around 1872. When I know
the birth place and year of Charles Henry (his sons were born prior to the
2001 census), I will apply for the correct birth certificate.

Just my bit on the census as a systems professional. Whenever possible, we
always try to avoid the 'big-bang' go-lives and go for a more phased
approach. I'm sure lessons have been learnt and pretty soon, it will set the
standards for researching on-line. I'm never ever had a go-live be
problem-free but I can imiagine some pretty frazzled people working on it
now. I'm patient but excited!

Barry (Brussels)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dorne Saunders" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: Christmas in Norfolk - RASBERRY, BUNKLE, HOWARD, RASBURY


> Hi Richard,
> Sorry, wrong!
> I thought of that but the Rasberry children were born after Robert and
> Elizabeth were married.
> I thought as there are BUNKLEs, HOWARDs & RASBERRYs all living in the same
> area - possably related. The children may have been adopted by relatives.
> Goodness, that is twice I have thought today!
> All the best,
> Dorne.
>
> Regards,
> Dorne Saunders (Australia).
> ANTI VIRUS INSTALLED
> *********************************
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Ball" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:28 PM
> >
> > Possibly the Rasberry children are Robert Howard's
> > stepchildren by a wife previous to Elizabeth Bunkle?
>
>
>
>


This thread: