NYDUTCHE-L Archives

Archiver > NYDUTCHE > 2006-12 > 1164976558


From: <>
Subject: Re: [NYDUTCHE] Two Questions
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 05:35:58 -0700
References: <BAY105-DAV144F787C67096E2FC8AAADDFDA0@phx.gbl>


Rick
I too have the same problim. I have John Lee b nine partners back in
1797. I have found another John Lee that was a quaker that removed to Osweg
o MM and then went back to Nine Partners again. Like you, I dont know which
Nine Partners he was from. This person may or may not be the father of my
John. Anyway, send me the name of the person you are trying to trace and if
I run across anything while I am looking for mine I will let you know.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Paddock" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:47 PM
Subject: [NYDUTCHE] Two Questions


> 1. Does anyone know which was "Typically" the most common referenced
area
> when a document refers to someone being from "Nine Partners"? Would it
> have been Greater Nine Partners or the more recent Little Nine Partners?.
> Any opinions? I have some ancestors born in "Nine Partners" with little
to
> go on other than some Quaker connection in a generation or two and a
> neighbor for a while named Buys.
>
>
> 2. I am trying to decipher a very poor copy of a Revolutionary War
> application. One part reads what appears to be "New Town", Beckman. I
> was actually able to determine all by myself that Beckman is really
Beekman
> Precinct (Don't get me started on all the various names involving
Beekman.)
> Was there a village ever called "New Town", or do I need to hire an 18th
> Century writing expert?
>
> Thanking any responder in advance for any helpful info.
>
> Rick
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
>


This thread: