OH-CENSUS-LOOKUP-L Archives
Archiver > OH-CENSUS-LOOKUP > 2005-09 > 1126190952
From:
Subject: Lookup for 1860/Monroe Co./Crook
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:49:12 EDT
Dear Jennifer,
Thank you for such a swift reply. The age is right for Mary;however, Ruth
would not be Rhoda. Rhoda would not have been born yet until c. 1862. Ruth
might have been a child of John's from a former marriage.
I really appreciate your work.
Sandy
This thread: