OH-CENSUS-LOOKUP-L Archives

Archiver > OH-CENSUS-LOOKUP > 2005-09 > 1126190952


From:
Subject: Lookup for 1860/Monroe Co./Crook
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:49:12 EDT


Dear Jennifer,

Thank you for such a swift reply. The age is right for Mary;however, Ruth
would not be Rhoda. Rhoda would not have been born yet until c. 1862. Ruth
might have been a child of John's from a former marriage.

I really appreciate your work.


Sandy



This thread: