PAF-5-USERS-L Archives

Archiver > PAF-5-USERS > 2007-09 > 1190781740


From: "Gary Templeman" <>
Subject: Re: [PAF-5] AF
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:42:20 -0700
References: <20070821130393.SM03148@jim.sisna.com><200708231438988.SM03148@jim.sisna.com><002f01c7e673$b810ba40$0202a8c0@BILLSDESKTOPC><46CF1C5C.8080301@ancquest.com><7.1.0.9.0.20070825221241.01a69c08@sisna.com><200709251504958.SM07252@jim.sisna.com>


As far as I know there is no such animal as an Ancestral File ordinance
reference. The ordinance information you find in the AF is originally from
the IGI and other official temple sources, or personal information, and
anything that was incorporated into an AF submission was there because the
submitter first got it from those sources. Anything in the AF is second hand
at best, and frequently plain wrong.

Gary Templeman


----- Original Message -----
From: "JMGreen" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 2:04 PM
Subject: [PAF-5] AF


> In converting from PAF 231 to PAF 5 my notes have become confusing:
>
> For one thing my sources for BAP etc as AF 4.12 are now invalid --
> well they would be valid if AF 4.12 were still available -- Thus I
> must convert all old AF ordinance references to IGI references -- if
> they exist. Expletive!
>
> But what might AF 83S077241D mean????
>
> The old and senile thank you
>
> J M Green
> Email: MailTo:
> WWW: HTTP://users.sisna.com/JMGreen

This thread: