PALANCAS-L Archives

Archiver > PALANCAS > 2002-07 > 1026140643


From: "Carl Hilton" <>
Subject: RE: [PALANCAS] "Son of the Above"
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:04:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <000f01c2267d$3943b020$aa8cb818@pavilion>


They were listed as Single.



-----Original Message-----
From: molly [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:45 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [PALANCAS] "Son of the Above"


Have you checked the marital status column? It should have a
S (single) M (married) D (divorced), or W (widow)
What is the name? I can check the 1880 census cds and see
whats on those.

Maureen (NY,USA)
Ye Old Directory Shoppe Select from approx.166 directory
cds
http://yeoldedirectoryshoppe.com/oldcitydirectories/CD.html
FREE transcription and look-up pages,message board on-line! Sign up now
to become a resource volunteer!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Hilton" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:09 AM
Subject: [PALANCAS] "Son of the Above"


> I have an 1880 household that lists a HEAD, then a
daughter, with the
> same last name; actually the standard "_____" in-lieu of
writing the
> last name again, then a boy under the daughter with a
different last
> name and in the relationship to head column, it has "son
of the
> above"... Am I to assume that the daughter did in-fact
have the same
> last name as the head and therefore was not married or
maybe divorced?
> Or could it just be a mistake on the census takers part?
>
> Carl
>
>




This thread: