PAPHILAD-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [PAPHL] IGI validity---:-)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:59:55 EDT

In a message dated 9/9/2004 1:45:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
writes:

I learned at the FHL last week that if an IGI post was made prior to 2000 or

2001 (I forget which), the poster was not required to post his/her name.
Fortunately, this has changed.
Merle



---
Merle-

That would apply to information submitted by a relative which is highly
unreliable anyway. It would not be necessary to know the submitter when the IGI
record comes from public vital records--the submitter would be the government
office.

Joan

This thread:

• IGI validity---:-) by
  • RE: [PAPHL] IGI validity---:-) by "John" <>
  • Re: [PAPHL] IGI validity---:-) by
  • Re: [PAPHL] IGI validity---:-) by

  • Re: [PAPHL] IGI validity---:-) by

  • Re: [PAPHL] IGI validity---:-) by