PAPHILAD-L Archives

Archiver > PAPHILAD > 2006-09 > 1157514759


From: "Ann Brown" <>
Subject: Re: [PAPhl] Cost of Marriage record or license
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:52:39 -0400
References: <538.4a9ecb80.322f6ea1@aol.com><ab1376630609051726jc097edakea20010e22ac063f@mail.gmail.com><008d01c6d15f$9fb0cbe0$6501a8c0@ldell>
In-Reply-To: <008d01c6d15f$9fb0cbe0$6501a8c0@ldell>


thanks for the explaination. That helps some. But I live in Florida so I
can't visit. That's a 200.00 plane trip at least. I may have to part with
the 130.00 after all. that sure hurts though.

On 9/5/06, Laurie <> wrote:
>
> Yes, if you are searching in the 1885-1916 timeframe, there are indexes on
> film, then you can order the film that has the appropriate
> affadavit. Here
> is the link to the LDS catalog page with more details:
>
>
> http://www.familysearch.org/Eng/Library/fhlcatalog/printing/titledetailsprint.asp?titleno=217392
>
> I traveled into the city for a half day at the archives, and there I
> obtained copies of several marriage records. It cost $8 for travel (would
> have been far higher had I driven in though!) plus $.75 per page copied (3
> pages on average for the marriage records) plus $ .25 per 15 minutes to
> use
> the reader with the printer. That is significantly lower, but it's a
> hassle
> to head into the city, so researchers do charge higher prices for that
> reason. Also, there is also no guarantee that a copy can be made while
> there
> due to lots of people using limited equipment. These records, by the way,
> are on film and I believe the same as those above.
>
> Hope this helps!
> Laurie
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> : That is still very expensive. Is there not a less expensive way to
> obtain
> a
> : copy. Were they copied by the LDS library ?
> :
> : Ann
>
> *********
> Visit the threaded archives of this list:
> http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/PAPHILAD
> *********
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>



--
Ann Brown " Cookie"

This thread: