QUAKER-ROOTS-L Archives
Archiver > QUAKER-ROOTS > 2008-05 > 1209758077
From: "Becky Gish" <>
Subject: Re: [Q-R] family not associated with my Quaker ancestors
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:55:04 -0500
References: <c2f.312e8b2b.354cc9b9@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <c2f.312e8b2b.354cc9b9@aol.com>
I agree. I also find that I discover new areas of research to try. It
is well worth looking at the emails that you think do not pertain to you
if you are truly doing serious research on ancestors.
Becky
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 2:47 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Q-R] family not associated with my Quaker ancestors
Over time I have found a number of "in-laws" or been able to flesh out
some
of my lateral lines from information I have found in messages with names
in
subject lines I thought had nothing to do with me. Each little nugget
we find
like that is worth the bit of time it takes to open and glance through
an
e-mail.
Burnis
**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on
family
favorites at AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without
the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
This thread: