QUAKER-ROOTS-L Archives

Archiver > QUAKER-ROOTS > 2008-05 > 1209760139


From: "Brown, Pat" <>
Subject: Re: [Q-R] family not associated with my Quaker ancestors
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 13:29:18 -0700
In-Reply-To: <7EC16414F74A034FB8B110F2D1E2D87AE5C1@2003server.castleprops.local>


I AGREE ALSO. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THE EXTRA EMAILS , JUST HIT DELETE.

-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Becky Gish
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 12:55 PM
To: ;
Subject: Re: [Q-R] family not associated with my Quaker ancestors

I agree. I also find that I discover new areas of research to try. It
is well worth looking at the emails that you think do not pertain to you
if you are truly doing serious research on ancestors.

Becky



-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 2:47 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Q-R] family not associated with my Quaker ancestors

Over time I have found a number of "in-laws" or been able to flesh out
some
of my lateral lines from information I have found in messages with names
in
subject lines I thought had nothing to do with me. Each little nugget
we find
like that is worth the bit of time it takes to open and glance through
an
e-mail.

Burnis



**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on
family
favorites at AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without
the quotes in the subject and the body of the message


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message




This thread: