QUEBEC-RESEARCH-L ArchivesArchiver > QUEBEC-RESEARCH > 2002-07 > 1027437130
From: "Richard Van Wasshnova" <>
Subject: Re: [Q-R] "Confirmed"? -religious or secular definition? was: David family ancestors
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:18:43 -0700
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <008401c22ef4$1211a780$6f3e2f04@Richard> <3D380F32.email@example.com> <00a901c230d5$fe3ec8d0$6f3e2f04@Richard> <3D3B0E35.firstname.lastname@example.org>
I didn't know religeous confirmation records were of any worth for parents.
Are those from PRDH? I've just realized I don't have and PRDH data on any of
my DAVID ancestors and I thought I had about all of them. I have Jacques,
Claude (my ancestor) and Guillaume as brothers who came to Quebec but their
parents didn't, am I correct?
Richard Van Wasshnova
Seal Beach, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bridget Kopetzky" <>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Q-R] "Confirmed"? -religious or secular definition? was: David
> Richard is correct. My statement was not as precise as it could have
> Jacques DAVID dit Pontife received the Sacrament of Confirmation
> on April 11, 1662 at Chateau-Richer. He was married on Aug. 29,
> 1662 at Chateau-Richer to Marie GRANDRY.
> Jette uses the following statements:
> confirme ddmmyy - meaning religious confirmation on that date
> au rec. 66 - meaning in the 1666 census (usually with a location)
> cite ddmmyy place - meaning known to have been in that place
> on that date (because there is some record showing it)
> Sorry to confuse anyone.
|Re: [Q-R] "Confirmed"? -religious or secular definition? was: David family ancestors by "Richard Van Wasshnova" <>|