QUEBEC-L Archives

Archiver > QUEBEC > 2002-06 > 1023301965


From: "J. Lesperance" <>
Subject: Re: [QUEBEC] Marriage of Francois LESPERANCE & Emilie LEMOINE early 1800's Quebec
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 07:32:45 -1100
References: <016601c2091a$3a238040$be95a118@hawaii.rr.com> <3CFE8636.E3C00854@tr.cgocable.ca>


Merci buttercups Des,
Jerry

----- Original Message -----
From: Dessaulles Beaudry <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [QUEBEC] Marriage of Francois LESPERANCE & Emilie LEMOINE early
1800's Quebec


> Hi Jerry,
> no sign of your Lesperance-Lemoine in the Loiselle index, nor in the
T-Riv. marriage index, and only four ( female) Lemoine marriages.
> In the T-Riv. mar. index Lesperance is referred to either Viau or
Aubuchon,
> Jacques,Jean Aubuchon/L'espérance s/o Jean+ Marguerite Sédilot( Mtl) m.
Marie Étienne d/o Philippe + Marie Vien ( 3-Riv.) 11/11/1687
> Pierre Viau/L'espérance s/o François + Marie Rollin ( Longueuil)
> m Elizabeth Isabelle Whiteford d/o John+ Amélie Schultz - 11/05/1842-
> No other Viau- L'espérance or Aubuchon marriages in this repertoire.
> No sign either in Cap-de-la-Madeleine.
>
> Loiselle gives us a long list of names- for dit- L'espérance
> ( lots of hope)
> Aubuchon, Binet, Guinard, Hébert, Hervieux, Lalonde, Leduc, Letard,
Levasseur, Magnan, Moreau, Rochereau, Tellier, Viau, +++++.
> Hope it still helps.
> Des.
>
> "J. Lesperance" a écrit :
>
> > Aloha,
> >
> > Searching for the marriage and parents of Francois LESPERANCE and Emilie
LEMOINE who had a son Dosithee/Docithee/Dosite born in 1829 at
Trois-Rivieres.
> >
> > Je recherche pour le mariage et les parents de Francois LESPERANCE et
Emilie LEMOINE qui avaient un fils Dosithee/Docithee/Dosite ne 1829 a
Trois-Rivieres.
> >
> > Jerry Lesperance
> > Aiea, Hawaii
>
>
> ==== QUEBEC Mailing List ====
> Welcome to the QUEBEC mail list. WE DO GENEALOGY!
> This is a tagline - taglines appear after every posting and
> are giving guide lines how to make the best of the list.
> Please erase those taglines before replying to the original message,
> and shorten the original down to the essential 'punchline'.
>

This thread: