RAGSDALE-L Archives

Archiver > RAGSDALE > 2004-10 > 1097271625


From: "bemillsap" <>
Subject: Re: [RAGSDALE-L] naming patterns
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:41:35 -0500
References: <01ce01c4abec$385bfa40$210110ac@gateway.2wire.net> <002a01c4ad57$3ff9c4f0$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg>


Hi Becky,
That's what I was hoping to discover. Either John William Ragsdale might
have been named after his father and paternal grandfather, or else maybe he
was named after both grandparents. (or he was just named something his
folks liked.)
Thanks so much for the feedback,
Billie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Lallier" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [RAGSDALE-L] naming patterns


> In my branch of Ragsdales, often the first son was named after both
> grandfathers. My great-grandfather was Joseph Robert Ragsdale, after his
> father's father Joseph Ragsdale and his mother's father Robert Trammell.
>
> Becky
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bemillsap" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 5:34 PM
> Subject: [RAGSDALE-L] naming patterns
>
>
> > Hey guys,
> > I need some help with naming patterns. Was the first son named after
the
> > father or the grandfather? For instance, John William; would the name
> > John have most likely been the father or grandfather? I'm playing the
> > "what if" game.
> >
> > Billie
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
> >
>
>
> ==============================
> Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
>


This thread: