RICHMOND-L Archives

From: Alan Hubbard <>
Subject: Re: [RICHMOND-L] Suffix
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:01:03 -0500

This is the way I see it. JBR did this several times but it does not seem
to be a problem in following a descent on any line in his book. Though I
have found that the lineage list just following an individual my not be
correct.

Alan

At 04:10 PM 2/10/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>To Jim Richmond,
>
>It is my guess that the letter 'a' after Daniel Richmond's number in
>J.B. Richmond's 'Richmond Family' can be explained as follows.
>All persons shown in the book are numbered seqentually but after
>members of Silas Richmond's family were originally listed and num-
>bered, J.B. recieved information that Silas had an additional child.
>Since the number 253 had already been assigned to another person,
>the fifth child of Silas was added as number 252a.
>
>Don Richmond
>
>
>==== RICHMOND Mailing List ====
>Richmond List archives:
>http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl
>To review subscription information and list guidelines, visit:
>http://www.scioto.org/Richmond/index.html
>
>

This thread:

• [RICHMOND-L] Suffix by "Donald S Richmond" <>

  • Re: [RICHMOND-L] Suffix by Alan Hubbard <>