ROOTS-L Archives
Archiver > ROOTS > 1989-06 > 0613882247
From: Alf Christophersen 02 45 41 97 <>
Subject: Letter from soc.roots on usenet netnews
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 89 22:50:47 EDT
>> File relayed from the Usenet NetNews list SOC.ROOTS
>> I am not responsible in any way for any information or text which is
>> displayed in the following text.
>>
>> Please send answers to THE LIST or the author of ORIGINAL MESSAGE.
>> In ANY CASE, DO NOT SEND ANY COMMENTS OR LETTERS DIRECTLY TO ME.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Path: ndsuvm1!cunyvm!psuvm!psuvax1!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uun
et!crdgw1!sunspot!blackje
From: (Emmett Black)
Newsgroups: soc.roots
Subject: Re: What programs ARE available for the Mac?
Message-ID: <>
Date: 09 Jun 89 01:57:32 GMT
Organization: GE Research; Schenectady, NY 12345
Reply-To: (Emmett Black)
Sender:
.crd.ge.com
References: <>
Lines: 40
Keywords: programs, Macintosh
Well, you really HAVE to look at PAF (Personal Ancestrial File)
from LDS (The Church of Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints aka the Mormons).
I've just gotten a copy of it and am fairly pleased with it so far.
It does have a real mac interface; I haven't tried to make postscript...
but i hope it does do that as well.... i'll have to check...
and with a $35 price tag - you can't beat it!
the biggest problem i have with it it as follows;
i got on the GENCOM bandwagon a LONG time ago before they got the
"standard" settled.... i have all my stuff on home brew computers and
systems that include a combination of relational databases, spread
sheets and other goodies... and i generate it all out in GENCOM format.
well... sort of... it is gencom... but there are a few glitches...
it seems that "NOTES" in PAF have to be "level 1" items....
and there seems to be no way to attach a note to a marriage record.
i had been recording notes such as "who performed" the ceremony,
and where were the family residences as notes subordinate to the
marriage record....
and similarly for individuals, i had notes subordinate to birth records.
for example:
1 BIRT
2 DATE 16 Feb 1985
2 NOTE Delivered via C-Section at 09:50 EDT.
well -- ALL notes seem to be requred to be "level 1" and attached
to an individual -- even though it is more appropriate to attach it
at a lower level -- or to the "FAMILY" record instead....
(you don't want to have the residences records attached to each person
in the family... (until they go their separate ways))
I've digressed... anyone have suggestions?
--Emmett
J.E.Black; GE Research/K1-3C26; Schenectady, NY 12345
This thread:
| Letter from soc.roots on usenet netnews by Alf Christophersen 02 45 41 97 <> |