ROOTS-L Archives

Archiver > ROOTS > 2006-09 > 1159373879


From: "Trevia W Beverly" <>
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: ROOTS-L Digest V06 #418
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:17:59 -0500
References: <200609270900.k8R906ep024466@lists5.rootsweb.com> <451A8456.3010006@bellsouth.net>


While it is sometimes difficult to wade through things ... and we do need to
remember that the circumstances may be illness, etc. ... the suggestions
were are for those who have no excuse except not thinking ...
I received a note back from Lola with additional information -and another
Lister send something they had found that looks promising - so we're off
and running to try to help with the request on Tom Price & family....

Trevia

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Renninger" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: ROOTS-L Digest V06 #418


> Trevia:
>
> I couldn't have said it better. When I see how some of these requests
> are phased, I wonder why "anyone" would respond.
>
> Don
>
> wrote:
>
> >ROOTS-L Digest Volume 06 : Issue 418
> >
> >Today's Topics:
> > #1 [ROOTS-L] Ricketts funeral directo ["Carolyne Gwin"
<]
> > #2 Greeley DAVIS-Ven. Co., PA ["Gary Edwards"
<.]
> > #3 tom price [""
<lucianl1]
> > #4 [ROOTS-L] FW: MARTIN, DOUGHERTY, C ["Sheila Aranyos"
<]
> > #5 Re: [ROOTS-L] tom price ["Trevia W Beverly"
<treviawbeverly]
> > #6 O'ROURKE - New York State []
> >
> >Administrivia:
> >Search over fifteen years of archived ROOTS-L messages at:
> > http://searches.rootsweb.com/roots-l.html
> >
> >If you would like to unsubscribe from ROOTS-L, send to
> > the message "unsubscribe" (without the
> >quotation marks). If you would like to receive ROOTS-L in mail
> >mode (each message as a separate e-mail), unsubscribe from ROOTS-L as
> >above, and then subscribe to ROOTS-M by sending the message "subscribe"
> >(again without the quotation marks) to
> >
> >If you would like to have a message included in the ROOTS-L digest,
> >send it to .
> >
> >If you didn't receive a recent digest, drop a note to
> > with the number of the missing digest, and
> >we'll attempt to send you a copy. (Why only attempt? Because if you
> >failed to receive the initial issue due to spam filtering on your end,
> >you'll also fail to receive a follow up copy...)

This thread: