ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-L Archives

Archiver > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > 2007-03 > 1173150555


From: "Ann Brown" <>
Subject: Re: [RMagic] People without a Surname
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:09:15 -0500
References: <ab1376630703051353jc712365n88c89b69cc29fdbe@mail.gmail.com><cb436f0703051512o3e4a5a4fgce92f966b94a692d@mail.gmail.com><ab1376630703051802r17f247ebx6e4eb818752b6604@mail.gmail.com><009001c75f9a$7a9c1480$6501a8c0@m1070n>
In-Reply-To: <009001c75f9a$7a9c1480$6501a8c0@m1070n>


Thanks to everyone for sharing all their ideas. I have not heard that in
the future my current practice will cause a problem in sorting or in
narrative print outs. Like some have said, we all learn to work around our
problems.

Ann


On 3/5/07, MScheffler <> wrote:
>
> There is probably no perfect solution that everyone likes. I keep
> hoping that the professional genealogists will come up with a standard
> which
> would be preferable to all of our different work-arounds.
>
> I use the nick name field a lot, so Anne's solution would not work for
> me.
>
> Until a better convention comes about, I use brackets around the
> married surname when the woman's surname is unknown, i.e. Nancy Ann
> [Hotchkiss]. I have never been happy having no surname at all for the
> woman
> and at least the married surname gives her some identity. The brackets
> work
> well in the identification process with multiple husbands, where I use the
> first married name and add the other husbands just as one would do with a
> woman whose surname was known..
>
> I had begun a few years back using ( ) around the married surname;
> but this is the standard for a missing surname, so I quickly changed to
> the
> brackets when I realized I was being misleading.
>
> To prevent misunderstandings on my WorldConnect database, I explain how
> I use the brackets. These bracketed names all sort together.
>
> Margaret Scheffler
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ann Brown" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 9:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [RMagic] People without a Surname
>
>
> > Tee,
> >
> > you should try my idea out. It's really neat as long as it dosn't cause
> > any
> > other problems
> >
> > It would come out like Ann (wife of John J Brown) Brown You can
> really
> > notice at a glance where they belong.
> >
> >
> > On 3/5/07, Tee Huffaker <> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ann,
> >> I also find that people without surnames get lost in the file. I hope
> >> we hear from others on how they deal with this.
> >> I use ( ) as part of the married name, so I know who they are. All
> >> these people are at the front of my index but at least have their
> >> married name attached to them.
> >> So, your entry would look like this Ann ( )Brown.
> >> Ann being the first name and ( )Brown being her surname.
> >> Tee
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/5/07, Ann Brown <> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> > I have started putting info in the" nickname" box on the person's
> file
> >> when
> >> > they don't have a last name.
> >> > first name *Ann* Nick name *wife of John* *Brown*. and then when
> it
> >> > appears in the person list the "wife of John Brown" comes up and I
> know
> >> > where that person belongs.
> >> >
> >> > Should this cause a problem down the road.? It is sure helpful now.
> >> > --
> >> > Ann Brown " Cookie"
>
>
>
>
> ===================================
> RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/
> http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS
> RM WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without
> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>



--
Ann Brown " Cookie"


This thread: