ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-L ArchivesArchiver > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > 2008-05 > 1211246021
From: "Jackie Wilson Goddard" <>
Subject: Re: [RMagic] Reference numbers
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 20:13:41 -0500
References: <email@example.com><006701c8b883$1497d320$0301a8c0@ald> <483034E5.firstname.lastname@example.org><098b01c8b9a9$c6c749a0$640fa8c0@sanfilipa08d70><008b01c8b9ce$6c25fe90$4471fbb0$@net>
Think of the RM Record number as a line number. If you're familiar with
spreadsheet programs, each individual record is alloted 1 row with multiple
cells (each fact). If you delete row 7, the spreadsheet renumbers all the
remaining rows, so #7 is no longer skipped.
In RM, the lines are renumbered when you "pack the database" rather than
right away. But it's the same principle.
Yes, sometimes when I'm working off a list, I prefer to use the record
number, particularly when I have multiple individuals with the same given
name, no middle, same surname. But I work off a current list, so the record
numbers are also current.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Peggy Hooper <>
> I have used the Record number assigned by RM in my files names for easy
> finding. What I find is that these numbers change so it really does not
> me in some cases. I know that I have the option of assigning a Reference
> number and that may be what I need to do. But I guess I don't understand
> reference numbers and the real object of using them.
> Would I have to go through all 20,000 names and assign a number? Why can't
> the record numbers remain static?
> Peggy Hooper
> California Genealogy & History Archives
> RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/
> RM WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without
> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|Re: [RMagic] Reference numbers by "Jackie Wilson Goddard" <>|