ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-L Archives

Archiver > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > 2012-01 > 1326589164


From: "L. L. Scott" <>
Subject: Re: [RMagic] RM5 and NewFamilySearch integration
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:59:24 -0600
References: <8CE9ED21D4D1AD2-1A14-C774A@Webmail-m104.sysops.aol.com><003701ccd1a8$9c5419d0$d4fc4d70$@org><8CE9FCB8EA87D1F-1924-99909@webmail-m024.sysops.aol.com><CAMh1cRqC2pGarmwS07LndX=zJ0WgSbF=EoJJrsVcY4JMGfL+0Q@mail.gmail.com><004801ccd1ba$abe7a8f0$03b6fad0$@org><4F11D48D.6080708@family-quest.com><CAMh1cRp1RjJ0v6JGyXOnK_QmjnRW=tj_2MdW+-BdzPLQqLVuuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMh1cRp1RjJ0v6JGyXOnK_QmjnRW=tj_2MdW+-BdzPLQqLVuuQ@mail.gmail.com>


You will need your LDS record number and date of baptism to register for
nFS.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dee Fox
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:20 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [RMagic] RM5 and NewFamilySearch integration

I was baptized LDS but moved and never attended the local LDS church.

I guess I'm with the non-LDS people then...?

dee

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, LB <> wrote:

> new.familysearch.org is the LDS site for LDS's newfamilysearch database
> for
> LDS members only. RootsMagic 4-5 interrogates from the same database.
> You
> can turn this feature on & off in RM4-5 and use when ready. IF you are
> LDS,
> you can work now from RM instead of the new.familysearch.org site. I
> actually find RM4-5 FamilySearch interrogation works much better than the
> LDS site. It also saves from working from 2 different websites at the
> same
> time, plus (it seems to me) that RM Familysearch works much smoother and
> better than NFS and allows you to up & download facts into RM4-5 & NFS.
>
> I also understand that when the newfamilysearch database goes public, it
> will be renamed "Family Tree" and available at Familysearch.org, under the
> "Search" tab. Non-LDS will have to create their own User ID & password, or
> use your current ID, if you have already created one earlier (ie:
> indexing,
> etc). The login will tell the database if you are a LDS member or not,
> and
> then will supply the appropriate features.
>
> I don't think Bruce can predict when "Family Tree" will become available
> to
> the public, but feel quite comfortable in saying that when it happens - He
> &
> RM will be ready & be quite functional. All you will have to do is "turn
> it
> on when you want to use it."
>
> (Note: LDS features have always been available in Bruce's database since
> the
> ancient days of Family Origins)
>
> Lynn
>
> Steven Niedermeyer wrote:
> > Hi Dee,
> >
> > There is a website published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
> > Saints that is similar to the Ancestry.com's online family tree. It's
> > located at: https://new.familysearch.org
> >
> > Currently I believe only members of the LDS Church have access to the
> > NewFamilySearch website. However, they have announced that it's only a
> > matter of time before it's open to everyone world-wide. When that
> happens,
> > I suspect it will become just as popular or more so than the
> > Ancestry.com
> > online family trees because it will be free.
> >
> > I don't want to get cornered into a product (FamilyTreeMaker) that
> appears
> > to intentionally have left out the interface to such a large online
> > collection of information (NewFamilySearch). I can understand why they
> > would as it's a competing product with Ancestry.com and they're trying
> > to
> > turn a profit. But it's a negative in my book because it basically
> creates
> > two large silos of genealogical data on the Internet. So it's up to
> > software developers to try to bridge the gap or for genealogists to
> double
> > enter everything. Keeping everything in sync is tough these. My guess
> is
> > Ancestry.com won't open their APIs (ability for software to talk
> directly to
> > their website) in order to "synch" from RootsMagic anytime in the
> > future.
> > NewFamilySearch has published their APIs so that any software (including
> > FamilyTreeMaker if Ancestry.com added that feature) can be certified to
> > synch with the NewFamilySearch website. Maybe Bruce could comment on
> that
> > point based on his experience to date.
> >
> > The closest I've been able to come to a happy medium is to use
> RootsMagic as
> > my primary desktop software and once every couple of years I export a
> GEDCOM
> > from RootsMagic and upload it to Ancestry.com. I feel it's important to
> > publish to Ancestry.com because I get a number of genealogy contacts a
> month
> > that have seen my online tree and sometimes provide info to me I didn't
> > already have.
> >
> > Kind of long-winded, but hopefully that explains a little bit more.
> >
> > Steven
> > Bellingham, WA
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > [mailto:] On Behalf Of Dee Fox
> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:42 PM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: [RMagic] RM5 vs. Family Tree Maker 2012
> >
> > I'm still very new to RootsMagic - what do you mean about it being the
> Best
> > NewFamilySearch integration?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > dee
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


===================================
RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/
http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS
WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG:
http://blog.rootsmagic.com/


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without
the quotes in the subject and the body of the message


This thread: