RUS-SARATOV-FRANK-L Archives
Archiver > RUS-SARATOV-FRANK > 2011-10 > 1319044324
From: maggiehein <>
Subject: [RUS-SARATOV-FRANK] Russian Historian On Trial For ViolatingPrivacy Laws
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:12:04 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Thank you to Elaine McDowell for alerting me to this story. The story is posted on the web site of Radio Liberty / Radio Free Europe:
http://www.rferl.org/content/russian_historian_on_trial/24363800.html
Russian Historian On Trial For Violating Privacy Laws
October 18, 2011
ARKHANGELSK, Russia -- Plaintiffs at the trial of a Russian historian
accused of illegally revealing personal data have given contradictory
testimony, RFE/RL's Russian Service reports.
Mikhail Suprun, who studied the life of ethnic Germans in the Soviet Union,
was charged with violating Article 137 of the Criminal Code, which forbids
encroachment upon a person's private life.
Suprun went on trial in the northwestern city of Arkhangelsk earlier this
month. His co-defendant, Aleksandr Dudarev, heads the Interior Ministry
department in Arkhangelsk Oblast.
Four years ago, Suprun and Nadezhda Shalygina, a postgraduate student at
Arkhangelsk's Pomor University, started a study on the fate of ethnic
Germans deported from Crimea and the Volga region during World War II as
"enemies of the Soviet people" to so-called "labor armies" in northern
Russia.
One of the goals of the study was to identify those who were deported and
chronicle the hardships they faced.
By 2009, Suprun and Shalygina had identified some 20 percent of the ethnic
Germans who had been deported to the northern Arkhangelsk region.
Germany's Red Cross expressed support for the publication of "The Book of
Memory" based on the results of Suprun's research.
But when the local prosecutor's office announced that the relatives of some
deported Germans were suing Suprun for revealing personal information about
their families, an investigation was opened.
Dudarev's lawyer told RFE/RL today that on October 17 the plaintiffs gave
vague and mutually contradictory testimony.
Dudarev said the plaintiffs reminisced about their own experiences and the
sufferings of their relatives between the 1940s and 1960s, but when asked
precisely what they are accusing the defendants of, they were unable to
answer.
"When the judge reminded them that they filed a lawsuit against the
defendants, the plaintiffs said Federal Security Service officers had
visited them and asked them to write complaints," he said. "Some of the
plaintiffs even stated that they never wrote any complaints. When one of the
plaintiffs said that, the judge showed him a document signed by him. The
plaintiff was very surprised but said: 'Yes, that is my signature, [I
suppose] that means I wrote that complaint.'"
Dudarev added that the investigator even insisted that Suprun be charged
with revealing state secrets, as documents with detailed information about
the activities of Russia's intelligence services were found in his personal
archive during the investigation. But the prosecutor's office refused to add
that charge to the lawsuit.
The trial is being held behind closed doors.
The so-called Volga Germans were the descendants of Germans who settled in
the Russian empire in the late 18th century.
A Volga German Autonomous Republic was established in 1924. But Stalin
abolished it in 1941 -- fearing the Volga Germans might collaborate with
Nazi Germany -- and had the German population of some 500,000 deported to
northern Russia, Siberia, and Kazakhstan. Up to one-third of them are
believed to have died en route or in exile.
This thread: