SACKETT-L Archives

From:
Subject: RE:[SACKETT-L] (4184) William D. Sackett, some questions
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:54:56 -0400

Cindy O. (I just realized yesterday that we have two Cindys on the list):

You beat me on the one about who gave the info to the census taker !! That explains the difference in relationship. That would also explain why she was listed in the household as well as being "at college". [I'm not sure that there was a college in Saegertown.]

So it looks like we've found another omission in Weygant's book.

Thurmon

"Cindy Owens" <> wrote:

>Thurmon, I bet Etta gave the info to the census taker, so Carrie was "her"
>niece . I've run across this in other families when I knew what the real
>relationship was, you can figure out who gave the info to the census taker.
>I'm also pretty sure Etta is just a daughter that Weygant missed. I sure am
>good at stirring up trouble huh?! :>)
>Cindy



__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with ! http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

This thread:

• [SACKETT-L] (4184) William D. Sackett, some questions by
  • Re: [SACKETT-L] (4184) William D. Sackett, some questions by "Cindy Owens" <>

  • RE:[SACKETT-L] (4184) William D. Sackett, some questions by