SAR-TALK-L Archives

Archiver > SAR-TALK > 2003-12 > 1070826232


From: "Michael Gallagher" <>
Subject: [[SAR-TALK]] Re: [[SAR-TALK]] Re: [[SAR-TALK]] Needs to be said!
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 14:43:52 -0500
References: <a.396b93d8.2d04c246@aol.com>


>From me...lukewarm...

The Supreme Court was intended to be somewhat independent but there are
still checks & balances on it...

Michael Gallagher
Maj. Robt. Kirkwood Chapter Historian, DE
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 12:49 PM
Subject: [[SAR-TALK]] Re: [[SAR-TALK]] Needs to be said!


> Perhaps we should rethink the SAR recessional, the independent Supreme
Court
> part. (I know I'm in hot water for this one)
>
> Russ Wirtalla
> Gen. Israel Putnam Branch, CT
>
>
> ==== SAR-TALK Mailing List ====
> The views expressed here are those of the individual SARtalk submitter
> and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSSAR, the state society,
> or the chapter to which he belongs.
>
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
>

This thread: