SCT-WIGTOWNSHIRE-L Archives

Archiver > SCT-WIGTOWNSHIRE > 2004-01 > 1075219737


From: "TheJones" <>
Subject: Re: [WIG LIST] pronunciation of McGeoch
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:08:57 -0500
References: <20040127123035.EHGS16066.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@[62.253.8.149]> <001001c3e4f4$c7876c00$92b97ad5@oemcomputer>


Diana - I didn't get the impression Bill was offended. He refered to you as
"just a wee young thing" - sounded affectionate to me. I haven't been
called "wee" or "young" in a while :-)

Fiona.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Diana" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WIG LIST] pronunciation of McGeoch


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bill.copland" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 12:29 PM
> Subject: [WIG LIST] pronunciation of McGeoch
>
> Sorry Bill, an unfortunate choice of word I used. I do apologise.No
offence
> intended to anyone. How can I make amends.?Perhaps "local pronunciation"
> would have been better.
> Each of my grandchildren in primary school in Stranraer at some stage has
> learned a poem "in the style" of Robert Burns.
> Diana
>
>


This thread: