SOG-UK-L Archives

From: Christopher Watts <>
Subject: [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 11:57:32 -0500

Roy wrote:

>>that faxed contracts are not technically legal and binding, only the
signed original<<

Are you sure on this, Roy? I recall a great deal of discussion as lawyers
were getting perturbed because they were filing faxes (of items with
contractual significance) on thermal paper and finding that they had faded
after a year or so.

Chris

This thread:

• [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies by Roy Stockdill <>

  • [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies by Christopher Watts <>

  • Re: [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies by Chris Broomfield <>
  • [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail by Roy Stockdill <>
  • Re: [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies by Michael Kay< >
  • Re: [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail by "Pickard - Hungary" <>
  • Re: [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies by Malcolm Austen <>
  • Re: [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies by Christopher Watts <>
  • Re: [SOG-UK-L] OFF topic - email versus snail mail reply policies by "Shirley Arabin" <>