SOG-UK-L Archives

Archiver > SOG-UK > 2002-06 > 1023048944


From: Tim Powys-Lybbe <>
Subject: Re: [SoG] 1901 Census : fiasco PRO and QineptiQ (sic)
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 21:15:44 +0100
References: <166.e795090.2a28f5d9@aol.com> <008601c209ad$f8ebf280$78c760cb@co.nz> <3CFA54D8.15F9D0FE@btinternet.com>
In-Reply-To: <3CFA54D8.15F9D0FE@btinternet.com>


In message <>
Peter Amsden <> wrote:

> This is particularly the case with distant members. We need to remember
> that there are probably more members unable to visit the SOG than those
> that are. Hence the majority who receive little benefit from membership
> are supporting the minority who do. This unbalance needs to be addressed
> in some way.

And what can be proposed?

--
Tim Powys-Lybbe
For a patchwork of bygones: http://powys.org



This thread: