SOG-UK-L Archives

Archiver > SOG-UK > 2002-06 > 1023064277


From: "La Greenall" <>
Subject: RE: [SoG] 1901 Census : fiasco PRO and QineptiQ (sic)
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 01:35:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <173872404b.tim@southfrm.demon.co.uk>


Decentralisation. Multiple local meetings that collectively would attract a
much greater proportion of the total membership than one central mtg could
ever do. I believe the Quakers and other such bodies might have tried
something similar.

Lawrence

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Powys-Lybbe [mailto:]
> Sent: 02 June 2002 21:16
> To:
> Subject: Re: [SoG] 1901 Census : fiasco PRO and QineptiQ (sic)
>
>
> In message <>
> Peter Amsden <> wrote:
>
> > This is particularly the case with distant members. We need to remember
> > that there are probably more members unable to visit the SOG than those
> > that are. Hence the majority who receive little benefit from membership
> > are supporting the minority who do. This unbalance needs to be addressed
> > in some way.
>
> And what can be proposed?
>
> --
> Tim Powys-Lybbe
> For a patchwork of bygones: http://powys.org
>
>

This thread: