SOG-UK-L Archives

Archiver > SOG-UK > 2002-06 > 1023082589


From: "Tom Perrett" <>
Subject: Re: [SoG] 1901 Census : fiasco PRO and QineptiQ (sic)
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 15:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <3CFA54D8.15F9D0FE@btinternet.com>


On Sun, 02 Jun 2002 18:24:39 +0100, Peter Amsden wrote:

>Sorry if this sounds cynical, but from my reading of past mail I am
>gaining the impression that many members feel sidelined by the manner in
>which the SOG operates.
>
>This is particularly the case with distant members. We need to remember
>that there are probably more members unable to visit the SOG than those
>that are. Hence the majority who receive little benefit from membership
>are supporting the minority who do. This unbalance needs to be addressed
>in some way.

As a very distant member let me say that I am perfectly happy
with the way the Society is organised and run.

What I am NOT happy with is the annual rant in this list
by a handful of members who seem to feel it is their
right to stir up trouble. If that is not their intent, then
that is how it looks.


Cheers,

Tom <> Tom Perrett

This thread: