STEER-L Archives

From: "Jack Steer" <>
Subject: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:32:37 +0100

Has anyone come across this situation before?

The Victoria BDM - Index from 1836 apparently includes the birth of Elizabeth Ann STEERE in Woodford, Victoria in 1856.

The problem that I have with this entry is that her birth was registered in Plymouth, Devon district (GRO 5b 246) in 1856. She may well have been born there on 1.9.1856

So why was she registered a second time in Victoria? She wasn't born there.



Regards,
Jack Steer
Banbury

This thread:

• [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE by "Jack Steer" <>
  • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE by Jeff Hazeltine <>
    • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE by "Jack Steer" <>
  • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE + victorian BDM STEERE & STEER by vt <>
    • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE + victorian BDM STEERE & STEER by "Jack Steer" <>
  • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE -children from victorian BDM by vt <>

  • [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by "Jack Steer" <>

    • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by vt <>
      • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by Jeff Hazeltine <>
        • Re: [STEER] Elizabeth Ann STEERE & Surrey Wills Abstracts by "Judy Thomas" <>
        • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by "Jack Steer" <>
      • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by "Jack Steer" <>
        • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by vt <>
        • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by Jeff Hazeltine <>
        • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by vt <>
          • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by "Jack Steer" <>
  • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by Jenny <>
    • Re: [STEER] Thomas Saunders STEERE and Elizabeth Ann STEERE by "Jack Steer" <>