SUFFOLK-L Archives

Archiver > SUFFOLK > 2003-09 > 1064231529


From: indy chick <>
Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] 1891 census look -up please, Lowestoft.
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:52:09 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <Law14-F1007bOsPTQxH00007726@hotmail.com>


LIsa,

There is this family in Bishop Wearmouth, Durham - George & Alice M with children including an Alice. The only thing is that a son George is shown - but it could be that he was enumerated twice if the family filled out the form a week before assuming he'd be at home and then he went to visit his grandparents who then included him on their form.

Anyway - what do you think?

93 Hendon Rd, Bishop Wearmouth, Durham
George HALL, Head, M,36, Fishmonger, Norfolk Lowestoft
Alice M do, Wife, M,28, do do
George, do, son, 9, Scholar, do do
Albert do, son, 7, do, do do
Alice do, daur, 4, do, do do
Hilda do, daur, 1, do do
John METCALF, Visitor, M, 33, Riveter, Durham Sunderland
Florence do, wife, M, 29, do do
Florence do, daur, 1, do do
Thomas do, son, 4, Scholar, do do

Wendy

Lisa Hall <> wrote:
Sally - ALICE HALL was born ALICE MARY MOORE Lowestoft, 1861.
Regards,
Lee


>From: "sally roberts"
>To: ,
>Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] 1891 census look -up please, Lowestoft.
>Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:50:10 +0000
>
>Hi Lisa,
>
>Nothing immediately obvious for Lowestoft, but if you could supply the
>birth place of Alice Snr it might be easier to search for the family.
>
>Sally
>
>
>>From: "Lisa Hall"

>>To:
>>Subject: [SFK-UK] 1891 census look -up please, Lowestoft.
>>Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:26:54 +0100
>>
>>Hi - could some helpful person with access to the 1891 Lowestoft census
>>please have a look for my GEORGE LEABON HALL and his wife ALICE. GEORGE
>>should be approximately 35 and ALICE about 30. I know they have a son also
>>GEORGE LEABON HALL who would be about 9 and a daughter ALICE aged about 3.
>>They may have many more children. In 1882 they lived on Anguish Street,
>>Lowestoft. ALICE was unmarried at the time of the 1881 census and is
>>listed as living with her parents but there is no sign of GEORGE LEABON
>>HALL.In the 1901 census there is no sign of either GEORGE, ALICE OR GEORGE
>>jnr. ALICE jnr is living with her grandparents in Lowestoft. I'd love to
>>have a sighting of them as a family.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Lee
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
>>http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband


www.thoughtcafe.co.uk The Thought Café "A quiet little corner of the internet to come and chat about reading & writing. Pour yourself a cup of coffee, put your feet up and come join us"
See my family tree at www.indykaf.com/familytree Researching - Oxfordshire : DRING, SOUCH, PARSONS, Yorkshire: BECKETT, SHAW, TRUEMAN, PEARSON, RUSH, ROWBOTTOM, MOUNTEER, Bath: SHELLARD Suffolk: COOPER, CRACK, ROSBROOKE, Kent: HICKMOTT London: HOLLINGTON, HICKMOTT, COOPER, SHELLARD, WINDELL, SHARPLESS
I'm proud to be a transcriber for FreeBMD http://freebmd.rootsweb,com and FreeCen http://freecen.rootsweb.com






This thread: