SUFFOLK-L Archives

Archiver > SUFFOLK > 2005-01 > 1104875723


From: "Wyant, Peter CIC" <>
Subject: RE: [SFK-UK] Re: 1851 Stow RD/GARMAN or GARNHAM
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:55:23 -0600


Andy's address is mailto: .

Thanks, Chris ...

PSW

-----Original Message-----
From: C. Alexander [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:41 PM
To: Wyant, Peter CIC
Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] Re: 1851 Stow RD/GARMAN or GARNHAM


Can't see Andy's address to send this direct.

Stow district Rickinghall Inferior Folio 022

Happy GARNHAM (f) 8
Ann 9mths
Caroline 1
Charles 14
Charles 47
Eliza 5
Henry 16
John 18
Ruth 10
Sophia 3
Susan 25
Susan 45

I don't know whether they were all at the same address, obviously. There
were also several GARNHAMS on Folio 021

Hope I've been able to help you - you've been helpful to me in the past.
Happy New Year.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wyant, Peter CIC" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:22 PM
Subject: [SFK-UK] Re: 1851 Stow RD/GARMAN or GARNHAM


> The following post is being forwarded to the list by the List Admin.
>
> Pls respond to the list or directly to the original poster, as appropriate
> or necessary.
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Kerridge, Andrew wrote:
>
>
> Once again, my posting has been rejected, and I know this was in Plain
> Text.
> Can you put on the list please for me?
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Andy Kerridge
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto:]
> Sent: 04 January 2005 19:52
> To: Kerridge, Andrew
> Subject: Re: 1851 Stow RD/GARMAN or GARNHAM
>
>
>
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4F296.C596AEAF
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
>
> > Can I ask if someone with easy access to the 1851 census index
> booklets =
> > or CD can have a look for a girl called Happy GARMAN bc 1845, so aged
> =
> > about 6. I doubt that the first name was her real name, maybe a =
> > contraction or a pet name. I say Stow RD, because we believe she was
> =
> > born Rickinghall, but no idea whether Inferior or Superior, and these
> =
> > two are in different RD's. I have Hartismere for Superior, but not
> Stow =
> > for the Inferior bit.
>
> > I am also aware that her surname is unusual, and maybe a mistake for
> =
> > something like GARNHAM, which is a more common surname for these
> parts
>
> > Rather than clog the list, if you can reply direct off-list that
> would
> =
> > be better I think
>
> > Best regards
>
> > Andy Kerridge
> > Leicester, UK
>
>
>
>
>


This thread: