TAYLOR-L Archives

From: Shani McKinney <>
Subject: Re: [TAYLOR-L] Charlie Taylor
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 09:51:34 -0700

Interesting indeed. As far as I know noone of my family was LDS, but you never
know. Alma in this case was female, but I find it interesting the way the two
names Alma and Charles are repeated... It could be there is a connection
especially through John Taylor. I don't know if he had any children who
remained or any relatives went along with him but remained in TX instead of
moving to UT. Do you have a time range for this migration? or birth/death dates
for John? That might give me a hint as to the feasibility of a connection. Given
that Alma was born in 1892, I would figure Charlie would have been born roughly
1870 or so (big assumption, I know).

> So after all that I think what we have here is a coincedence but let
> me know what you think.

Shani McKinney, formerly of Mesa, AZ ;)

This thread:

• [TAYLOR-L] Charlie Taylor by Shani McKinney <>

  • Re: [TAYLOR-L] Charlie Taylor by Shani McKinney <>

  • [TAYLOR-L] Charlie Taylor by <>
  • Re: [TAYLOR-L] Charlie Taylor by Shani McKinney <>