TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2000-06 > 0960932388


From: "William Roberts" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Problem with UFT to TMG
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 17:39:48 -0400
References: <807FD7B95D4FD21197FF00A0C9E1F91704A23AFA@exchange2.ir.miami.edu>


Scot

I think you are comparing two different things. UFT does not estimate dates
like FTW. The est dates in UFT were put there by the person entering the
data.

Myrnice

----- Original Message -----
From: Sutton, Scot G. <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: [TMG] Problem with UFT to TMG

snip....
> Unfortunately, if "UFT Est." dates are imported via GenBridge the same way
> as FTM's "WFT Est." dates, they are going to import as "Bet." dates and
not
> "Say" dates (as I feel would be more a more appropriate alternative). When
> this occurs, it is impossible to tell the difference between a "Bet." date
> entered by the user and a "Bet." date created from a WAG "WFT Est." date
> during GenBridge import. One of the few things in the program design with
> which I am completely at odds. Why can't we just have "Est." dates?
>
> Scot



This thread: