TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2000-09 > 0968468532
From: Richard Brogger <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Re: Copious Ancestors
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 22:02:12 -0500
References: <4.3.2.7.0.20000908095706.00ac1a70@mail.keynet.net><39B93224.91432E18@infoave.net> <39B9B98D.44075444@fls.infi.net>
Hi Lewis,
Just as there is more to genealogy then sources, there is
more to TMG then the ability to document sources. There are
features in TMG I have not even tested. TMG can record more
types of sources in more detail then I care to list. Just
because TMG has all these features, does not mean I need to
use every one of them. Nor does anyone need to fill in
every type of source for every person. If you feel you
must, go right ahead. I am looking for people, not sources
and TMG also works very well for people, dates and all kinds
of things besides sources, in most cases far better than
FTM.
I have to ask, are you an attorney?
Richard
Lewis Peregory wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> If you really believe what you are saying why do you use such a
> program as TMG that is famous for its ability to document your
> sources? Seems like FTM would meet your needs. Just wondering?
> Lewis
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Re: Copious Ancestors by Richard Brogger <> |