TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2000-12 > 0977416216


From: "arlene" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Exhibit Multiple Usage
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:30:16 -0500
References: <8f.48f689d.27738aaf@cs.com>


The reason I would like to have the images *on* TMG is that I have most of
my photos on CDs. I can't then, of course, send anything to my family
unless I also send the CDs....which I don't care to do.
Arlene
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Exhibit Multiple Usage


> In a message dated 12/21/00 10:28:08 AM Central Standard Time,
> writes:
>
> << Why can't TMG be set up to "keep" images on its database i.e. FTM which
> contains all of the images all of the time.
>
> It would be far easier to save everything at once. Also, then a backup
> would contain everything needed.
>
> I've noticed that messages have suggested that internal images cannot be
> connected to more than one person and external images can be but then are
> not backed up.
> >>
> Arlene,
> You can store the images internally, but some of us prefer to not do so.
I
> have several hundred family pictures which I am currently using in TMG.
My
> backup for UFT (which stored pictures internally) was over 70 MBs. My
backup
> for TMG (which is about 50/50 internal/external) is only 15 MBs-I have
since
> added pictures to TMG that were not in UFT. Since I have those pictures
> already backed up on CD, there is no since in keeping a copy in TMG (at
least
> in my opinion.)
> One thing I do miss from UFT was the ease of which you could link several
> people to the same picture, but I, for one, would gladly give up that
feature
> for the ability to chose to keep the pictures externally.
> Teresa
>
>

This thread: