TMG-L ArchivesArchiver > TMG > 2002-04 > 1019861473
From: "John Cardinal" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] married name
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:51:15 -0400
bob gillis wrote:
> The married tag has worked fine for me for the 8 years I have been using
> TMG, since Ver 0.96d. I cannot see having to useg John's utility to add
> married names on a regular basis.
It is certainly true that the TMG function works properly and may be sufficient
for most people. For people who follow the convention of putting the maiden name
in the suffix after exclusion markers ("--(Jones)"), my utility eliminates some
of the manual effort. Those people--and I am one of them--run TMG Utility
periodically to add the married name tags. I suspect you knew that, but just in
case any lurkers didn't...